Re: [PATCH 6/7] walk $PATH to generate list of commands for "help -a"
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 28, 2007, 10:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vodejv9gt.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20071028094530.GA7749@srparish.net>
Scott Parish <sRp@srparish.net> writes:
Show 12 quoted lines
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 11:18:02PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> > We walk all the paths in $PATH collecting the names of "git-*" >> > commands. To help distinguish between the main git commands >> > and commands picked up elsewhere (probably extensions) we >> > print them seperately. The main commands are the ones that >> > are found in the first directory in $PATH that contains the >> > "git" binary. >> ... > Its not clear to me what exactly you're looking for me to change, > just the wording i'm using in my comment? Or are you refering to > the approach?
"git" binary will be found as /usr/bin/git while git-foo will be found as /usr/libexec/git/git-foo in such an installation that takes advantage of $(gitexecdir). And /usr/libexec/git/git will not exist. Using existence of /usr/bin/git (I am referring to your 'first directory on $PATH that contains the "git" binary' above) as the cue for the location of "main commands" is wrong.
> When i email the changes, should i keep emailing the whole > patch series, or just the few patches that have changed?
It's up to you. Obviously, if you are replacing 2 patches out of 100-patch series, you would not want to resend the whole thing, though ;-)