Re: Git Notes idea.
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> ... But the main point
> still stands: you go from commit to note, not from note to commit. And
> this is in stark contrast to tags, where you go from tag to commit, _not_
> from commit to tag.
>
> That is a fundamental _difference_ between tags and notes, so that I
> refuse to accept the notion of notes being a generalized form of tags.
Hmm, how would you explain things like "git describe" (and "name-rev")?