Show 21 quoted lines
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 06:02:56PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> > As it turns out, topgit is using refs/top-bases/ in HEAD,
>> > leading us to re-loosen (at least temporarily) the
>> > validate_headref check made in b229d18a. This patch does the
>> > corresponding loosening for the symbolic-ref safety valve,
>> > so that the two are in agreement once more.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
>>
>> Actually we should simply revert afe5d3d5 altogether with the above
>> message, as it introduced a test that expects the tightened behaviour.
>
> Is there any reason to throw away the "must be in refs/" safety valve,
> though? That was the actual patch I started with and solved my problem,
> and the "tighten to refs/heads/" bit came from discussion. That is, I
> think having a safety valve in symbolic-ref that matches
> validate_headref is orthogonal to how tightly validate_headref matches.
>
> But yes, I obviously failed to run the test suite on the follow-up patch
> I sent. The final test in t1401 would need to be reverted, as well.
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>