Re: [PATCH 1/2] tests: eliminate unnecessary setup test assertions
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 7, 2011, 22:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7voc3eupy3.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110506222951.GA24474@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> I think multiple -L is not quite enough. I want a single "-L" that > matches every instance of a pattern, like: > > -L "/ ()/,+0"
Of course I am aware that needs to be a part of the multiple -L topic; after all I was the one who invented -L "$regexp" support ;-)