From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 22:05:24 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tests: eliminate unnecessary setup test assertions
Message-ID: <7voc3eupy3.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110506222951.GA24474@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> I think multiple -L is not quite enough. I want a single "-L" that
> matches every instance of a pattern, like:
>
>   -L "/ ()/,+0"

Of course I am aware that needs to be a part of the multiple -L topic;
after all I was the one who invented -L "$regexp" support ;-)