Re: [PATCH 0/4] convert.c clean-up
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 10, 2011, 14:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7voc3alk9c.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <BANLkTi=fjLkqWB2MTGtKE93qSjXU76cpvA@mail.gmail.com>
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
Show 15 quoted lines
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> Yeah, I think that would probably make more sense. If a file is small >> enough, it is more sensible to send it to a loose object just like any >> other files. We do not want to invite users to make a mistake of marking >> it as bigdata and send it straight to a packfile. Having one less knob to >> tweak is always a good thing to do. >> >> However, while reviewing your patch, I noticed that convert.c was littered >> with misnamed types, variables and functions to the point to make it >> almost unreadble as the result of its evolution. I originally wrote this >> series so that I can add "bigdata" sensibly, and it turns out that there >> is no benefit to do so for now, but the clean-up by itself would be worth >> it. > > I still don't like "bigdata" attribute.
I think we are in agreement. I do not like it anymore and that was what I tried to say in the first paragraph, and that was why I said "it turns out that there is no benefit" in the second paragraph.