Re: Git blame only current branch
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 13, 2011, 05:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vobvdvx9c.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <8739cpteat.fsf@gmail.com>
Vijay Lakshminarayanan <laksvij@gmail.com> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> The code reads fine when there's no numeral 1 around but now it doesn't > read well. I think refactoring > > struct commit_list *l > > to > > struct commit_list *lst > > is justified. Thoughts?
Not justified at all.
What is "lst" and why is it not spelled "list"? It is a disease to drop vowels when you do not have to.
If I were to name a new variable that points at one element of a linked list and is used to walk the list (surprise!) "element" or perhaps "elem" for short, but in the context of that short function I honestly do not see much need for such a naming. The variable is extremely short-lived and there is no room for confusion.