Re: [PATCH 0/2] config includes, take 2
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 6, 2012, 07:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vobtc8l3i.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20120206062713.GA9699@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> ... But the point of > duplicate suppression was that individual config files wouldn't have to > know or care what was being included elsewhere.
I think you wanted to say "the point of inclusion mechanism" is that individual configuration files would not have to know, and I think I agree.
Show 5 quoted lines
> So I'm actually thinking I should drop the duplicate suppression and > just do some sort of sanity check on include-depth to break cycles > (i.e., just die because it's a crazy thing to do, and we are really just > trying to tell the user their config is broken rather than go into an > infinite loop). As a bonus, it makes the code much simpler, too.
Yeah, I stand corrected. It was a bad suggestion.
Thanks.