Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/4] Perl rewrite of Ruby git-related
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 1, 2013, 17:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vobamgqqh.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <1372590512-21341-1-git-send-email-sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
> In this submission, the command name has changed to git-contacts since > git-related felt too generic. (git-contacts seemed best of several > possibilities I surveyed: git-people, git-interested, git-mentioned, > git-blame-us.)
I admit I am pretty bad at naming, but "contacts" sounds like the most sensible name for what it wants to do (blame-us sounds cute to my ears, though ;-).
> No attempt is made to answer Junio's v9 review[5], as I lack sufficient > insight with '-C' options to be able to respond properly.
I just wanted to see if we want to allow the end user of this script to specify what -C level they want the underlying blame to use, or just a hardcoded one should suffice (and if so an explanation why).
> My Perl may be rusty and idiomatic usage may be absent.
That is OK. We need to start somewhere.
Thanks. Folks, please discuss ;-).