Re: [PATCH 1/2] for-each-ref: "creator" and "creatordate" fields
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Nov 3, 2006, 02:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vmz79l0bi.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <200611022017.31351.jnareb@gmail.com>
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> From fa1a32c9a7c8a31b122df7d07f4a8885cbe120d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> > Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 13:33:46 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] for-each-ref: "creator" and "creatordate" fields > > This adds "creator" (which is parallel to "tagger" or "committer") > and "creatordate" (corresponds to "taggerdate" and > "committerdate").
The first line should not be in the message. I agree that it is sensible not to call this "epoch", and "creator" is fine by me.
Thanks. Will apply.