From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 02:40:33 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] for-each-ref: "creator" and "creatordate" fields
Message-ID: <7vmz79l0bi.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <200611022017.31351.jnareb@gmail.com>

Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:

> From fa1a32c9a7c8a31b122df7d07f4a8885cbe120d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
> Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 13:33:46 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] for-each-ref: "creator" and "creatordate" fields
>
> This adds "creator" (which is parallel to "tagger" or "committer")
> and "creatordate" (corresponds to "taggerdate" and
> "committerdate").

The first line should not be in the message.  I agree that it is
sensible not to call this "epoch", and "creator" is fine by me.

Thanks.  Will apply.