Re: Rebase max-pack-size?
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- May 12, 2007, 22:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vmz09veec.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <56b7f5510705121325h65c62147h2b633fdddaece0be@mail.gmail.com>
"Dana How" <danahow@gmail.com> writes:
> Since max-pack-size has appeared, and disappeard, in "pu" twice > and never made it into "next", I'm guessing I should rebase/merge it on > top of the other recent pack-objects work. I may get to this tonight; > perhaps I'll send the patchset in one email with multiple attachments?
I am still holding onto the series on its own topic branch, but merging it to 'pu' and resolving conflicts seem pointless while I am (and hopefully the rest of the list ought to be ;-) primarily concentrating on last-minute bugfixes in preparation for v1.5.2.
A rebase to be queued in 'next' would be good, though.
Thanks.