From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 22:57:31 GMT
Subject: Re: Rebase max-pack-size?
Message-ID: <7vmz09veec.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <56b7f5510705121325h65c62147h2b633fdddaece0be@mail.gmail.com>

"Dana How" <danahow@gmail.com> writes:

> Since max-pack-size has appeared, and disappeard, in "pu" twice
> and never made it into "next",  I'm guessing I should rebase/merge it on
> top of the other recent pack-objects work.  I may get to this tonight;
> perhaps I'll send the patchset in one email with multiple attachments?

I am still holding onto the series on its own topic branch, but
merging it to 'pu' and resolving conflicts seem pointless while
I am (and hopefully the rest of the list ought to be ;-)
primarily concentrating on last-minute bugfixes in preparation
for v1.5.2.

A rebase to be queued in 'next' would be good, though.

Thanks.