Re: [PATCH 0/2] Update git-send-email-script with --compose
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Sep 5, 2005, 18:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vll2b4ake.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050905153705.GD5335@mythryan2.michonline.com>
Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com> writes:
Show 16 quoted lines
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:16:57PM +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote: >> >> - reads "subject" from the first line of STDIN or file. If the line >> doesn't start with [PATCH it provides the [PATCH] prefix. I found it >> really confusing that it wants to get 'from' in the first line... >> that's not what git-format-patch produces! > > Sorry about that - I always export using git-format-patch using --mbox, > and those work nicely. I'm a bit reluctant to do the [PATCH] fixup, but > I think I will: > > 1. Detect [PATCH] or [PATCH [0-9]+/[0-9]+] (Sorry for the horrid > fake-regexp) > 2. Provide a --no-fixup-subject to turn that off. > > (TODO #2)
To be consistent with the other tools in tools/ directory, the above is probably 's/^/[PATCH] / unless (/^\[PATCH/])'
> In this case, remember that this was an attempt to help users patch bomb > lists, getting all the subtle details correct. The prompting is there > to help get the subtle details correct!
You could error out without asking if that is what is happening.
> Well, I'm not. Try "git format-patch --mbox -o patchdir origin" and see > if that works better for you.
Martin, --mbox has the added benefit that it consistently preserves the From: and Date: information even for your own patches, because it implies --date and --author. By default without --author and --date these are not preserved from the original commits for your own patches, primarily because format-patch without --mbox was written for reorganizing and reordering existing patches (i.e. export, concatenate some, edit some hunks, and eventually feed it to applymbox to make commits; you do not typically want to keep the original author date for this kind of use).
> I do apologize for not realizing that the default git format-patch > output doesn't match what git send-email script expects the "legacy" > mode - I'll sort that out one way or another as well. (TODO #3)
I do apologize for not really saying what --mbox does and what the format-patch output without --mbox is meant for.
Martin, is there a reason you do not want --mbox format (e.g. format-patch --mbox spits out Subject: line undesirably formatted while it does what you want without --mbox)?