***DONTUSE*** Re: [PATCH] Use a hashtable for objects instead of a sorted list
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Feb 12, 2006, 12:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vlkwgdbk6.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <87accwlt8k.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes:
> (GCC should do the rest.) >... > AFAICS, obj_allocs is a power of two.
Yes, I already have something like these in my tree (the latter did not help much as far as I could tell, though).
****HOWEVER****
Do not use this (not just my patch but with the whole hashtable version) in your production repository yet.
I've got a mysterious corruption and bogus output from fsck-objects, and have been tracking it (see the timestamp of this message).
1.2.0 will most likely to be be *delayed*. I have to first make sure my private repository is sane. Grrrrrrrr.