Re: Why is it bad to rewind a branch that has already been pushed out?

From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Feb 4, 2007, 20:08 UTC
Message-ID: <7vlkjdr8hj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <200702041716.39999.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>

Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> writes:

> Mention git-revert as an alternative to git-reset to revert changes.

Thanks; that makes sense.  Applied.

It is not a biggie but for future reference you might want to check your KMail configuration to avoid the wrapped line below:

Show 7 quoted lines

> diff --git a/Documentation/tutorial.txt b/Documentation/tutorial.txt
> index 5fc5be5..129c5c5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/tutorial.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/tutorial.txt
> @@ -461,6 +461,8 @@ this branch.  If this branch is the only branch containing 
> those
>  commits, they will be lost.  Also, don't use "git reset" on a