Re: [PATCH] Respect core.autocrlf when preparing temporary files for external diff

> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 12:18:33AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Ok.  Although I already queued the removal to 'pu' for tonight's pushout
>> and it is way too late to revert that, I think I didn't have to remove the
>> function.  The codepath that lets you cheat by borrowing from the checkout
>> runs convert_to_git() when it borrows, and if you are seeing a meaningful
>> optimization even with that overhead, perhaps it would be worth keeping.
>
> I certainly haven't done exhaustive tests. Obviously the one I did was a
> bit contrived. I just think it makes sense to have numbers rather than
> saying "this probably doesn't do anything anymore".
>
>> While the purist in me says #1 above is the right argument to make for
>> feeding "clean" version, I suspect that the textconv or extdiff tools more
>> often are not made from scratch and ported across platforms than are
>> cobbled up together out of tools the script writer finds on his platform.
>> I suspect that Dscho's "a tempfile should look like a checkout" would be
>> much friendlier to them in practice for this reason.
>
> I think you and I have about the same feeling on this, then. As somebody
> who does not actually use smudge/clean filters at all, I am willing to
> defer to Dscho's opinion, which is based on practical experience.