Re: [PATCH 0/5] Verify GPG signatures when merging and extend %G? pretty string
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 26, 2013, 01:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vli9bue40.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <5150E1C3.9020609@physik.tu-berlin.de>
Sebastian Götte <jaseg@physik.tu-berlin.de> writes:
> Rebased it onto the current 'master'. The second patch fixes that the GPG > status parser ignores the first line of GPG status output (that would be caught > by the new merge signature verification test case).
Thanks.
Does it still make sure that it won't be fooled by the expected string appearing in the middle of a line, not at the beginning?