From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 01:46:55 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Verify GPG signatures when merging and extend %G? pretty string
Message-ID: <7vli9bue40.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <5150E1C3.9020609@physik.tu-berlin.de>

Sebastian Götte <jaseg@physik.tu-berlin.de> writes:

> Rebased it onto the current 'master'. The second patch fixes that the GPG
> status parser ignores the first line of GPG status output (that would be caught
> by the new merge signature verification test case).

Thanks.

Does it still make sure that it won't be fooled by the expected
string appearing in the middle of a line, not at the beginning?