Re: [PATCH 2/3] Convert hash functions to char instead of struct object
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 19, 2009, 07:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vk54d8tfx.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <4A12507A.3050307@viscovery.net>
Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Dan McGee schrieb: >> -static unsigned int hash_obj(struct object *obj, unsigned int n) >> +static unsigned int hash_chars(const unsigned char *c, unsigned int n) > > hash_chars suggests that this function hashes arbitrary character > sequences, but it doesn't do that. Wouldn't hash_object_id be a better > name? (And the parameter would then obviously be named sha1 or id.)
Yes, the parameter to this function is what we call "unsigned char *sha1" everywhere else in the code. hash-object-id or hash-object-name is a good name for the function.