Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] CHERRY_HEAD
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 15, 2011, 22:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vk4h1lzjj.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTik2NM+mxKgZy_9dCwydz+An4sFM_a4U9mdrJBq3@mail.gmail.com>
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
> I've read this over, haven't run it, but I really like the idea. It > sucks that you have to save away the commit sha1 somwhere after a > failed cherry-pick to use it again. It should just behave like `git > rebase --continue`, which this implements.
I don't understand. What do you think rebase does to be able to continue? Doesn't it have to save the commit object name away somewhere?