From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:10:24 GMT Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] CHERRY_HEAD Message-ID: <7vk4h1lzjj.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes: > I've read this over, haven't run it, but I really like the idea. It > sucks that you have to save away the commit sha1 somwhere after a > failed cherry-pick to use it again. It should just behave like `git > rebase --continue`, which this implements. I don't understand. What do you think rebase does to be able to continue? Doesn't it have to save the commit object name away somewhere?