Re: git full diff output issues..
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- May 26, 2005, 21:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vis15aczv.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.58.0505261402470.2307@ppc970.osdl.org>
>>>>> "LT" == Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:
LT> On Thu, 26 May 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> >> So what do you want from me at this point? Nothing?
LT> Yeah, I'm happy. Sorry for the false alarm.
No problem. I still kinda like Anton's proposal for conceptual cleanness, but if the tool can cope with what we already have then less cluttering in the output is better for human eyes.
Let me again remind you about git-external-diff-script patch. When you encounter more gotcha in the built-in diff output format in the future, it would be a valuable tool to experiment and express what you would like to have git-apply to parse.