Re: Approxidate licensing
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Oct 11, 2006, 07:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7viriruw16.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610101246241.9789@iabervon.org>
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> [1] git log and git blame are pretty impressive, but they don't quite > catch that most of date.c was written by David as part of commit-tree.c, > then Tony replaced it with a version that uses curl, then Edgar separated > it out into a date.c and simultaneously reverted Tony's changes. On the > other hand, the commit messages do say this, and you can use git log and > git blame to verify that they're true. The only thing they don't let > you verify is what the differences are between the date.c added in > ecee9d9e and the similar part of commit-tree.c in 812666c8. If someone > wants to make git blame *really* magic, date.c would be a good test case.
That's good to know. I have in my head a super-duper blame that I outlined in my obituary for git-annotate, but that is still a vaporware and will continue to be for some time.