Re: Approxidate licensing
- From
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
- Date
- Oct 11, 2006, 07:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1160553423.7920.60.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610101246241.9789@iabervon.org>
On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 13:39 -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> Would the three of you agree to license date.c under the LGPL or BSD? It > looks like you're the only authors of non-trivial changes [1]. And it seems > reasonable to want the date parsing thing under non-GPL terms outside of > git.
Yeah, LGPL and BSD are both fine by me -- although I don't actually recognise much of my own code in there.
Btw, why isn't the meaning of 'tea-time' properly modified according to the locale?
-- dwmw2