Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] refs: implement simple transactions for the packed-refs file
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 20, 2013, 18:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vip18vdcb.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <51C342B7.5050002@alum.mit.edu>
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> On 06/20/2013 07:11 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Perhaps I am missing something from the previous discussions, but I >> am having trouble understanding the "main packed ref cache" part of >> the above. "main" as opposed to...? > > "main" as opposed to "submodule".
I see.
> No, the scenario would be that a git process wants to change a reference > in a submodule directly, as opposed to starting another git process > within the submodule, as I believe is done now. Maybe it's too > far-fetched even to consider...
Perhaps. But the "singleton lock because we only handle main packed ref cache" does not prevent us from doing so later, so I think v3 is OK.
Thanks.