git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH] Disallow creating ambiguous branch names by default

From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date
Aug 17, 2011, 18:41 UTC
Message-ID
<7vhb5fev8a.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To
<1313569298-3879-1-git-send-email-conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com> writes:
> Before this change, it was comparatively easy to create a confusingly
Drop everything before the ", ".
> named branch (like "origin/master" or "tag.1"). The former case is
> particularly biting to newcomers, who suddenly find themselves needing
> to handle nuances of the refs namespaces.

If you start forbidding certain names, newcomers will need to be exposed the same nuances to understand why what they wanted to do is not allowed, so that is not an argument.

My preferences (take them as "the ground rules" if you want) are:
 - We don't disallow what we have long allowed, without a good reason;
 - We make sure new people will get a warning with useful advice.

I would be happy to see the end result that warns when the end user creates a branch (or a tag) that is ambiguous _when_ it is created (not "much later, when we noticed there are ambiguous refs"), and offers an advice message to use "branch -m" to rename it away (control the message with a new "advice.*" configuration and unless explicitly declined with it, always give the advice).

> In both cases, git commands would omit a warning about "ambiguous refs"
> if they noticed that this had occurred,

Assuming that you meant s/omit/emit/, I do agree that what we do right now is suboptimal. I just tried these two:

	$ git branch v1.0.0
        $ git checkout v1.0.0
        warning: refname 'v1.0.0' is ambigous.
	$ git branch -m v1.0.0-branch
        $ git checkout -b v1.0.0
        Switched to a new branch 'v1.0.0'
	$ git checkout v1.0.0
        warning: refname 'v1.0.0' is ambigous.
	Already on 'v1.0.0'
	$ git branch -m v1.0.0-branch-2

We should be giving these warning messages immediately after creating potentially problematic refs, i.e. just after "git branch v1.0.0" and "git checkout -b v1.0.0". The user experience should look like this instead:

	$ git branch v1.0.0
        warning: refname 'v1.0.0' is ambiguous.
        advice: you may want to rename it to an unambigous name with
        advice: git branch -m v1.0.0 v1.0.0-branch
	$ git branch -m v1.0.0 v1.0.0-branch ;# thanks for an advice
        $ git checkout -b v1.0.0
        warning: refname 'v1.0.0' is ambiguous.
        advice: you may want to rename it to an unambigous name with
        advice: git branch -m v1.0.0-branch-2
	$ git branch -m v1.0.0-branch-2 ;# thanks for an advice
Previous: Conrad IrwinNext: Vijay Lakshminarayanan
Message 2 of 10 in “Disallow creating ambiguous branch names by default”
  1. Disallow creating ambiguous branch names by defaultConrad Irwin, Aug 17, 2011
  2. Junio C HamanoAug 17, 2011
  3. Vijay LakshminarayananAug 18, 2011
  4. Stephen BashAug 18, 2011
  5. Conrad IrwinAug 19, 2011
  6. Stephen BashAug 19, 2011
  7. Conrad IrwinAug 19, 2011
  8. Junio C HamanoAug 19, 2011
  9. Conrad IrwinAug 19, 2011
  10. Junio C HamanoAug 19, 2011

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.