Re: [PATCH 1/4] hooks: Add function to check if a hook exists
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 29, 2012, 16:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vhan4g5ny.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20121229145032.GB3789@pug.qqx.org>
Aaron Schrab <aaron@schrab.com> writes:
> Since I'm going to be changing the interface for this hook in v2 of > the series so that it will be more complicated than can be readily > addressed with the run_hook() API (and will have use a fixed number of > arguments anyway) I'll be dropping the run_hook_argv() function.
Just to make sure there is no misunderstanding (sorry for sending the message without finishing it with this clarification at the end in the first place). I didn't mean that converting all of the existing callers must come earlier than introducing a new hook invoker.
I just wanted to make sure that we are aware that we are adding to our technical debt, if we are adding another that is also specialized; as the proposed interface looked sufficiently generic, it would be the ideal one to make _other_ ones thin wrappers around it to unify the various codepaths.
Thanks.