Re: [PATCH 2/2] Resolve double chmod() in move_temp_to_file()
Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Saturday 28 March 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> writes:
>> > - if (chmod(filename, 0444) || adjust_shared_perm(filename))
>> > + if (chmod(filename, get_shared_perm(0444)))
>>
>> Your get_shared_perm() will end up feeding 0444 to S_ISDIR(), which would
>> most likely say "no" and cause real harm, but there is no guarantee that
>> we won't start checking S_ISREG() or other things in get_shared_perm()
>> later. I do not like this.
... should have been s/and cause/and cause no/; I think you read it correctly, though...
Show 13 quoted lines
> ...
>> diff --git a/sha1_file.c b/sha1_file.c
>> index 8869488..5bfc36c 100644
>> --- a/sha1_file.c
>> +++ b/sha1_file.c
>> @@ -2263,7 +2263,7 @@ int move_temp_to_file(const char *tmpfile, const
>> char *filename) *
>> * The same holds for FAT formatted media.
>> *
>> - * When this succeeds, we just return 0. We have nothing
>> + * When this succeeds, we just return; we have nothing
>
> Small nit: This belongs in the previous patch, doesn't it?
Thanks for all the above fixes.
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>