Re: [WIP PATCH] Manual rename correction
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 31, 2012, 20:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vfw87isx1.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20120731192342.GB30808@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> A much better hint is to annotate pairs of sha1s, to say "do not bother > doing inexact rename correlation on this pair; I promise that they have > value N".
Surely. And I suspect that the patch to the current codebase to do so would be much less impact if you go that way.