From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:20:42 GMT
Subject: Re: [WIP PATCH] Manual rename correction
Message-ID: <7vfw87isx1.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120731192342.GB30808@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> A much better hint is to annotate pairs of sha1s, to say "do not bother
> doing inexact rename correlation on this pair; I promise that they have
> value N".

Surely.  And I suspect that the patch to the current codebase to do
so would be much less impact if you go that way.