Re: [PATCH 3/3] read-tree -m 3-way: handle more trivial merges internally
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Jun 10, 2005, 19:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vekba7zli.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vaclzclqd.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
>>>>> "JCH" == Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> writes:
JCH> So, yes I ended up arguing that the intelligent merge logic JCH> could and probably needs to look at the trees involved ;-).
"Could look at, and probably be better off looking at," would have been a better wording.
Linus, please discard the patches from me that you have not applied about the "loosening of too strict index requirements" (yesterday and the day before). I think I am finally getting somewhere but the solution, if it works, would be somewhat different from what I have been sending you.