Re: [PATCH 3/3] read-tree -m 3-way: handle more trivial merges internally
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Jun 9, 2005, 17:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v7jh3phkk.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.58.0506090800580.2286@ppc970.osdl.org>
>>>>> "LT" == Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:
LT> No, I think this is quite possibly wrong for several reasons.
I agree with everything you said.
I need to regurgitate other points you raised, but one immediate comment on the "lost remove" case. The current two-way code has the same brokenness in that it does not unlink removed files under "-u". We either need the "list of files to be removed", or we need to make two-way abort if we see these "remove" cases.