git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Optionally check for uncommitted changes before switching branches.

From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date
Dec 7, 2006, 23:01 UTC
Message-ID
<7vejrbqpjb.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To
<20061207194358.GF12143@spearce.org>
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> writes:
> What about when this option is enabled then -m means do what we
> did before, and -m -m (or -mm, or -m2) does what -m does when the
> option is false?
Wouldn't --force be more appropriate?
Previous: Shawn Pearce
Message 4 of 4 in “Optionally check for uncommitted changes before switching branches.”
  1. 2/2 Optionally check for uncommitted changes before switching branches.Shawn O. Pearce, Dec 7, 2006
  2. Junio C HamanoDec 7, 2006
  3. Shawn PearceDec 7, 2006
  4. Junio C HamanoDec 7, 2006

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.