From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 23:01:12 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Optionally check for uncommitted changes before switching branches.
Message-ID: <7vejrbqpjb.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20061207194358.GF12143@spearce.org>

Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> writes:

> What about when this option is enabled then -m means do what we
> did before, and -m -m (or -mm, or -m2) does what -m does when the
> option is false?

Wouldn't --force be more appropriate?