Re: New way of tracking remote branches -- question
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Jan 5, 2007, 23:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vejq9c9tf.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <776323.21089.qm@web31808.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com> writes:
> I can see that the remote heads are where they are supposed to be > but no local tracking heads are created (by default). I had > to do this manually.
Ah, after firing off a few messages, I think I now guessed what you are talking about correctly.
You are talking about the separate remote layout "git clone" creates, and talking about the fact that there is nothing in refs/heads/ except master while refs/remotes/origin/ mirrors what the remote side has faithfully, aren't you?
If that is the case, I can explain. It is a good topic to talk about.