New way of tracking remote branches -- question
- From
- Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com>
- Date
- Jan 5, 2007, 23:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <776323.21089.qm@web31808.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
I can see that the remote heads are where they are supposed to be but no local tracking heads are created (by default). I had to do this manually.
Old behavior was that git did that for you automatically. So I suppose this is another newbie protection.
What is the now the new, accepted way of tracking locally remote branches? (other than creating them manually in refs/heads?)
Thanks, Luben