Re: Separate default push/pull?
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 12, 2010, 00:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7veikrl1m1.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20100212001417.GC21930@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> I think what he would need is a "push.defaultRemote" config option, > which universally overrides branch.*.remote for pushing.
Or "branch.*.pushremote".
But does it really make sense to get changes from one place and send changes to somewhere completely unrelated?