From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:49:26 GMT
Subject: Re: Separate default push/pull?
Message-ID: <7veikrl1m1.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100212001417.GC21930@coredump.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> I think what he would need is a "push.defaultRemote" config option,
> which universally overrides branch.*.remote for pushing.

Or "branch.*.pushremote".

But does it really make sense to get changes from one place and send
changes to somewhere completely unrelated?