Re: git bisect code 125 - "WFT?"
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 17, 2011, 17:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vei654omv.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110317072723.GH11931@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> 2. If we do detect such a mishap, I'm not sure that "indeterminate > result" is necessarily the best result, as that will just keep > trying more and more commits without success. It is more likely a > sign of a poorly written test script, and the best thing we could > do is die and say "your test script looks buggy".
Exactly. I agree "Aborting the bisect as run-script is a crap" is the right thing to do here.