Re: git bisect code 125 - "WFT?"
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 16, 2011, 21:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v1v267no9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTikZ3Po-YdhO-qCn5usVkt4J196eFF6YdbAeMG_X@mail.gmail.com>
Piotr Krukowiecki <piotr.krukowiecki@gmail.com> writes:
> Opinions? Would it be possible to change the meaning of the codes now > (in 1.8.0)?
How about just documenting why it is a bad idea to use 126 or 127 as you found out somewhere, and stopping there, iow, without changing the code to use 126/127 that we consider it is a bad idea to use and avoided using so far?