Re: [PATCH 0/8] Improve git-status --ignored
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 19, 2013, 14:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vehfbla1y.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACsJy8DShce6bXfyWyHk7pqg4PA-cAn1bKh0hgFYX=s486nwaA@mail.gmail.com>
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
Show 12 quoted lines
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> Karsten Blees <karsten.blees@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> This patch series addresses several bugs and performance issues in >>> .gitignore processing that came up in the inotify discussion. >> >> Thanks. >> >> How does this interact with the nd/read-directory-recursive-optim >> topic that has been cooking for a while? > > I think 8/8 is another version of nd/read-directory-recursive-optim
Yeah, it seems so; even though the series is much larger, overall it looks to me a cleaner solution without a specific special case.
Would we we better off kicking nd/read-directory-recursive-optim back to 'pu' (and eventually ejecting it) and replacing it with a reroll of Karsten's series when it comes, perhaps?