From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:48:57 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Improve git-status --ignored
Message-ID: <7vehfbla1y.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACsJy8DShce6bXfyWyHk7pqg4PA-cAn1bKh0hgFYX=s486nwaA@mail.gmail.com>

Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:

> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Karsten Blees <karsten.blees@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> This patch series addresses several bugs and performance issues in
>>> .gitignore processing that came up in the inotify discussion.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> How does this interact with the nd/read-directory-recursive-optim
>> topic that has been cooking for a while?
>
> I think 8/8 is another version of nd/read-directory-recursive-optim

Yeah, it seems so; even though the series is much larger, overall it
looks to me a cleaner solution without a specific special case.

Would we we better off kicking nd/read-directory-recursive-optim
back to 'pu' (and eventually ejecting it) and replacing it with a
reroll of Karsten's series when it comes, perhaps?