Re: Pure renames/copies
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Nov 21, 2005, 22:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vd5ktoe52.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <43823E31.2050500@zytor.com>
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> writes:
> Okay, in that post Linus suggests that -M without an argument should be > == 100% (1.0), thus avoiding having to mess up the meaning of -M100 as > 0.100. It seems like a really odd thing to have -M100 mean something > that's completely out of line with the rest of the meaning.
True, but it might be too late to change that; I suspect people expect -M to do a bit more than pure renames by now.