Re: Pure renames/copies
- From
- H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
- Date
- Nov 21, 2005, 21:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <438235AA.8070805@zytor.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vacfxrdao.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 19 quoted lines
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes: > > >>Of course, arguably "-M100" should really do this optimization for you. >>Junio? > > > Probably something like this would suffice. > > -- >8 -- > Subject: rename detection with -M100 means "exact renames only". > > When the user is interested in pure renames, there is no point > doing the similarity scores. This changes the score argument > parsing to special case -M100 (otherwise, it is a precision > scaled value 0 <= v < 1 and would mean 0.1, not 1.0 --- if you > do mean 0.1, you can say -M1), and optimizes the diffcore_rename > transformation to only look at pure renames in that case. >
Any reason we can't make it take an actual decimal number, like -M1.0 or -M0.345? It seems odd and annoying to invent our own notation for floating-point numbers, especially in userspace.
-hpa