Re: [PATCH] Additional merge-base tests
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Jul 4, 2006, 07:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vd5cln8ji.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <44AA0DAE.1060308@gmail.com>
A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com> writes:
Show 18 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano wrote: >> A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> This demonstrates a problem with git-merge-base. >>> +# Setup for second test set >>> +# >>> +# PL PR >>> +# / \/ \ >>> +# L2 C2 R2 >>> +# | | | >>> +# L1 C1 R1 >>> +# | | | >>> +# L0 C0 R0 >>> +# \ | / >>> +# S >>... > Not _that_ pathological in practice, given that you can't really > depend on the timestamps in a distributed SCM.
After I looked at the timestamps you assigned to these sequences I fully agree they are not pathological at all. For each "repository owner" who makes a single strand of pearls, time seems to be flowing monotonically.
1 1
/ \/ \
4 -1 4
| | |
3 -2 3
| | |
2 -3 2
\ | /
0