Re: Deprecate git-fetch-pack?

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Nov 11, 2007, 21:16 UTC
Message-ID: <7vd4ugcwkm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711111103240.4362@racer.site>

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

Show 15 quoted lines

> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2007, Ask Bj?rn Hansen wrote:
>
>> For new users the superfluous programs are a burden making it harder to 
>> learn how everything works.
>
> This should be a non-issue.  We really should start deprecating 
> "git-<command>" in favour of "git <command>" for real.
>
> New users should not even be told that this is correct usage.
>
> My reason?  We have plumbing, and we will always have plumbing, as 
> commands.  A regular git user does not _want_ to see that.  Without said 
> deprecation she _will_, however.

If you can write "git-commit" and "git commit" interchangeably while you cannot say "git-cat-file" and are forced to say "git cat-file", I suspect that would lead to a great confusion and unhappy users.

I wonder if making the distinction between plumbing and porcelain in the git(7) page even more cleaner would help.