Re: [PATCH 2/3] commit/status: "git add <path>" is not necessarily how to resolve
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 15 quoted lines
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 01:02:02AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> When the desired resolution is to remove the path, "git rm <path>" is the
>> command the user needs to use. Just like in "Changed but not updated"
>> section, suggest to use "git add/rm" as appropriate.
>
> I no longer even see these messages due to advice.statushints, but the
> overall direction of the series looks sane to me.
>
> However:
>
>> - color_fprintf_ln(s->fp, c, "# (use \"git add <file>...\" to mark resolution)");
>> + color_fprintf_ln(s->fp, c, "# (use \"git add/rm <file>...\" as appropriately to mark resolution)");
>
> This should be "as appropriate".
Heh, I kant speel. Fixed and re-pushed out on 'pu'.
Thanks.