Re: [PATCH 2/3] commit/status: "git add <path>" is not necessarily how to resolve
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Dec 12, 2009, 09:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20091212091556.GA30509@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <1260608523-15579-3-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com>
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 01:02:02AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> When the desired resolution is to remove the path, "git rm <path>" is the > command the user needs to use. Just like in "Changed but not updated" > section, suggest to use "git add/rm" as appropriate.
I no longer even see these messages due to advice.statushints, but the overall direction of the series looks sane to me.
However:
> - color_fprintf_ln(s->fp, c, "# (use \"git add <file>...\" to mark resolution)"); > + color_fprintf_ln(s->fp, c, "# (use \"git add/rm <file>...\" as appropriately to mark resolution)");
This should be "as appropriate".
-Peff