Re: [PATCH] pretend-sha1: grave bugfix.
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Feb 16, 2007, 07:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v8xeya7bw.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070216050943.GD28894@spearce.org>
"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org> writes:
> Aren't we using this for git-blame --contents? How'd that ever > work for a non-empty file?
My guess is that git-blame's blob handling has its own built-in cache to avoid read_sha1_file(), and that single "initial" blob is primed by hand, so read_sha1_file() is usually not called for that object name.